Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Vampires"

From AltWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
A lot of these things seem more suitable as techs, really, than as racial abilities. Anyway, that's all I'm going to say for the moment. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 01:43, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
 
A lot of these things seem more suitable as techs, really, than as racial abilities. Anyway, that's all I'm going to say for the moment. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 01:43, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
 +
 +
This race does not have sufficient disadvantages to balance its advantages, when Excellent bias is taken into account. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 20:53, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:53, 2 October 2006

First of all, some of the 'pros' and 'cons' seem... missorted. Immortality is really a con, since it requires them to do stuff, but doesn't really give them any immediate benefit unless we have an 80 year timegap. Which won't happen.

Tainted Blood isn't really a pro OR a con, given that it doesn't really give any benefit or penalty to the vampire, except to encourage people to slaughter them for turning their friends into vampires. So, really, again, a con. (This is not the only problem I have with tainted blood. Altering people's basic racial statistics in mid-game is an annoying 'feature'. Almost as annoying as Clippy.)

For Whispering Heart, dump the PL-specific numbers. You don't need that any more than Nameks have PL-specific numbers for their advanced senses.

A lot of these things seem more suitable as techs, really, than as racial abilities. Anyway, that's all I'm going to say for the moment. Hroefn 01:43, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

This race does not have sufficient disadvantages to balance its advantages, when Excellent bias is taken into account. Hroefn 20:53, 2 October 2006 (CDT)