Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Vampires"
m |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This race does not have sufficient disadvantages to balance its advantages, when Excellent bias is taken into account. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 20:53, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | This race does not have sufficient disadvantages to balance its advantages, when Excellent bias is taken into account. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 20:53, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| − | Thanks for the bench mark, I know where the balance stands now. | + | Thanks for the bench mark, I know where the balance stands now. --[[User:Allen|Allen]] 13:13, 3 October 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:13, 3 October 2006
First of all, some of the 'pros' and 'cons' seem... missorted. Immortality is really a con, since it requires them to do stuff, but doesn't really give them any immediate benefit unless we have an 80 year timegap. Which won't happen.
Tainted Blood isn't really a pro OR a con, given that it doesn't really give any benefit or penalty to the vampire, except to encourage people to slaughter them for turning their friends into vampires. So, really, again, a con. (This is not the only problem I have with tainted blood. Altering people's basic racial statistics in mid-game is an annoying 'feature'. Almost as annoying as Clippy.)
For Whispering Heart, dump the PL-specific numbers. You don't need that any more than Nameks have PL-specific numbers for their advanced senses.
A lot of these things seem more suitable as techs, really, than as racial abilities. Anyway, that's all I'm going to say for the moment. Hroefn 01:43, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
This race does not have sufficient disadvantages to balance its advantages, when Excellent bias is taken into account. Hroefn 20:53, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Thanks for the bench mark, I know where the balance stands now. --Allen 13:13, 3 October 2006 (CDT)
