Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Oathsworn Protectors"

From AltWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "While My Life For You is socially disadvantageous, mechanically, it's actually an advantage for the pair, as it allows them to opt to distribute damage more efficiently. Normally...")
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
While My Life For You is socially disadvantageous, mechanically, it's actually an advantage for the pair, as it allows them to opt to distribute damage more efficiently. Normally you have to get a tech to let you take damage for another person. This is especially true if it's possible for a single mage to have multiple Protectors. -[[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[User_talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 11:13, 3 March 2013 (PST)
 
While My Life For You is socially disadvantageous, mechanically, it's actually an advantage for the pair, as it allows them to opt to distribute damage more efficiently. Normally you have to get a tech to let you take damage for another person. This is especially true if it's possible for a single mage to have multiple Protectors. -[[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[User_talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 11:13, 3 March 2013 (PST)
 +
 +
--I was considering how this would be used, and I knew such an application as you mentioned was entirely what would happen. I am considering having the damage be unaffected by Damage Reducing techs. I'll see what others have to think before I decide. -[[User:DaShizer|DaShizer]] 3:26 (EST), March 3, 2013

Revision as of 12:27, 3 March 2013

While My Life For You is socially disadvantageous, mechanically, it's actually an advantage for the pair, as it allows them to opt to distribute damage more efficiently. Normally you have to get a tech to let you take damage for another person. This is especially true if it's possible for a single mage to have multiple Protectors. -Hroefn T 11:13, 3 March 2013 (PST)

--I was considering how this would be used, and I knew such an application as you mentioned was entirely what would happen. I am considering having the damage be unaffected by Damage Reducing techs. I'll see what others have to think before I decide. -DaShizer 3:26 (EST), March 3, 2013