Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Elves"
From AltWiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It might be easier just to require that the secondary power be no less (and no more?) than a certain fraction of the first, or of the total PL. Same effect, easier concept to grasp. --[[User:Icebreed|Ice]] 01:15, 29 August 2006 (CDT) | It might be easier just to require that the secondary power be no less (and no more?) than a certain fraction of the first, or of the total PL. Same effect, easier concept to grasp. --[[User:Icebreed|Ice]] 01:15, 29 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Probably a decent way to go about it, yeah. [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 02:42, 29 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:42, 29 August 2006
Looking all right. However, I'm not sure the Arcane Tradition/Family Spec combo is as effective of a disadvantage as might be assumed. At the most, it'll cost the character 500 PL, put to a "useless" PL type.Tiryst 20:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
- Good point. I was thinking of fixing that by requiring that one-third of gains, up to maximum allowable cap, would be required to be put to the secondary power level(s). How about that? Hroefn 23:29, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
It might be easier just to require that the secondary power be no less (and no more?) than a certain fraction of the first, or of the total PL. Same effect, easier concept to grasp. --Ice 01:15, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
- Probably a decent way to go about it, yeah. Tiryst 02:42, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
