Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Technique Development"
From AltWiki
m (Rules talk:Enlightenment moved to Rules talk:Technique Development: Now how'd that get over THERE?) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Excellent bias at 65% base, Dismal at 135% base, then? Or no? Comments/concerns/outright protests/french revolutions? --[[User:Icebreed|Ice]] 06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | Excellent bias at 65% base, Dismal at 135% base, then? Or no? Comments/concerns/outright protests/french revolutions? --[[User:Icebreed|Ice]] 06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly). [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 22:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:55, 1 June 2008
So, if we change Excellent bias, we should also change Dismal bias to reflect it.
Excellent bias at 65% base, Dismal at 135% base, then? Or no? Comments/concerns/outright protests/french revolutions? --Ice 06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly). Tiryst 22:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
