Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Technique Development"
From AltWiki
m |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Excellent bias at 65% base, Dismal at 135% base, then? Or no? Comments/concerns/outright protests/french revolutions? --[[User:Icebreed|Ice]] 06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | Excellent bias at 65% base, Dismal at 135% base, then? Or no? Comments/concerns/outright protests/french revolutions? --[[User:Icebreed|Ice]] 06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
− | :I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly). [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] | + | :I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly). |
+ | :Also, I wish I could edit Rules pages to fix some grammatical/syntactical pet peeves of mine :( [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 23:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:06, 1 June 2008
So, if we change Excellent bias, we should also change Dismal bias to reflect it.
Excellent bias at 65% base, Dismal at 135% base, then? Or no? Comments/concerns/outright protests/french revolutions? --Ice 06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly).
- Also, I wish I could edit Rules pages to fix some grammatical/syntactical pet peeves of mine :( Tiryst 23:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)