Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Weapon Proficiency"
From AltWiki
m (Woot) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It counts for both melee and ranged use, for weapons that are compatible with both. So, it counts for these (since the knives are balanced for throwing), and it counts, for instance, if someone uses a rifle to buttstroke an enemy. Alternately, melee weapons that are not balanced for throwing (ie, most swords) would not gain WP for it, since it's not something that's practiced to the point of proficiency. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[User_talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 15:51, 10 February 2008 (PST) | :It counts for both melee and ranged use, for weapons that are compatible with both. So, it counts for these (since the knives are balanced for throwing), and it counts, for instance, if someone uses a rifle to buttstroke an enemy. Alternately, melee weapons that are not balanced for throwing (ie, most swords) would not gain WP for it, since it's not something that's practiced to the point of proficiency. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[User_talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 15:51, 10 February 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thanks for the clarification. :) [[User:Marcus|Marcus]] | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 10 February 2008
So this is something I've recently begun to ask myself about this technique. I'll use Ciel as an example. I've always used her long knives as long ranged weapons due to weapon prof, since it gives her a lot more speed, even if no damage bonus is given. But does having weapon proficiency also give her melee proficiency, if she chooses not to throw knives around? Or does she have to get a separate melee WP for the knives to get those bonuses? Marcus
- It counts for both melee and ranged use, for weapons that are compatible with both. So, it counts for these (since the knives are balanced for throwing), and it counts, for instance, if someone uses a rifle to buttstroke an enemy. Alternately, melee weapons that are not balanced for throwing (ie, most swords) would not gain WP for it, since it's not something that's practiced to the point of proficiency. Hroefn T 15:51, 10 February 2008 (PST)
- Thanks for the clarification. :) Marcus
