Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cardinal Power Wielder Act"

From AltWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I like it as a whole but the Catagory 1, in specific to Property damage, needs to be clarafied. I mean it could easily be viewed as Non sanctioned spar's on anything but your own property could lead to a catagory 1 offense. To keep this from happening, then maybe we should say that any crime of property damage must meet with a criteria. The damage must, in essence, show that reckless force was used, and no consideration of the public well fare is shown as well. Just my thoughts on it. :)
+
I like it as a whole but the Catagory 1, in specific to Property damage, needs to be clarafied. I mean it could easily be viewed that nNon sanctioned spar's on anything but your own property could lead to a catagory 1 offense. To keep this from happening, then maybe we should say that any crime of property damage must meet with a criteria. The damage must, in essence, show that reckless force was used, and no consideration of the public well fare is shown as well. Just my thoughts on it. :)

Revision as of 14:25, 23 November 2006

I like it as a whole but the Catagory 1, in specific to Property damage, needs to be clarafied. I mean it could easily be viewed that nNon sanctioned spar's on anything but your own property could lead to a catagory 1 offense. To keep this from happening, then maybe we should say that any crime of property damage must meet with a criteria. The damage must, in essence, show that reckless force was used, and no consideration of the public well fare is shown as well. Just my thoughts on it. :)