Talk:Cardinal Power Wielder Act

I like it as a whole but the Catagory 1, in specific to Property damage, needs to be clarafied. I mean it could easily be viewed that non sanctioned spar's on anything but your own property could lead to a catagory 1 offense. To keep this from happening, then maybe we should say that any crime of property damage must meet with a criteria. The damage must, in essence, show that reckless force was used, and no consideration of the public well fare is shown as well. Just my thoughts on it. :) Sorry about the lack of tag Spurtacian 20:58, 23 November 2006 (CST)

Consentual public fighting -- that is, sparring -- is a Category 2 offense in any case, not category 1. "Public" may need to be better defined -- I assume that it implies sparring in private homes or facilities meant for sparring is legal, and it's geared toward fighting just out in the streets for fun, but there is no question that sparring is Category 2 at the very least. Also, please sign your comments by placing four tildes after each comment, so we know who has which opinions. Tiryst 15:49, 23 November 2006 (CST)

It'd be nice to have a little clarification in that regard. Sparring in the grocery store will get you punished, but sparring in the neighborhood's designated well-secured sparring ring would be peachy-keen, correct? (I actually made up one of those somewhere in a neighborhood in West city, actually...) And it would be only FAIR, for power wielding sorts, to have somewhere to take their fighting so they won't get repremanded. Otherwise, it sounds like a "NO SPAR 4 U" sort of rule. Lampdevil 22:30, 23 November 2006 (CST)