Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Oathsworn Protectors"
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
--I was considering how this would be used, and I knew such an application as you mentioned was entirely what would happen. I am considering having the damage be unaffected by Damage Reducing techs. I'll see what others have to think before I decide. -[[User:DaShizer|DaShizer]] 3:26 (EST), March 3, 2013 | --I was considering how this would be used, and I knew such an application as you mentioned was entirely what would happen. I am considering having the damage be unaffected by Damage Reducing techs. I'll see what others have to think before I decide. -[[User:DaShizer|DaShizer]] 3:26 (EST), March 3, 2013 | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is a society based template for the [[Venustas]]. I figured I should note that here before I write the fluff pending outcome. -[[User:DaShizer|DaShizer]] March 4, 2013 | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 4 March 2013
While My Life For You is socially disadvantageous, mechanically, it's actually an advantage for the pair, as it allows them to opt to distribute damage more efficiently. Normally you have to get a tech to let you take damage for another person. This is especially true if it's possible for a single mage to have multiple Protectors. -Hroefn T 11:13, 3 March 2013 (PST)
--I was considering how this would be used, and I knew such an application as you mentioned was entirely what would happen. I am considering having the damage be unaffected by Damage Reducing techs. I'll see what others have to think before I decide. -DaShizer 3:26 (EST), March 3, 2013
This is a society based template for the Venustas. I figured I should note that here before I write the fluff pending outcome. -DaShizer March 4, 2013
