Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Conquest"
From AltWiki
(New page: Woa, woa, woa. Is this rule implying that people can forcibly remove control of a territory from another player? Or is this Conquest rule set just to be applied to territory that as of yet...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Woa, woa, woa. Is this rule implying that people can forcibly remove control of a territory from another player? Or is this Conquest rule set just to be applied to territory that as of yet has not been taken? It doesn't seem fair that a player takes the time and patience to build something for a group of IC maurading invaders to just steal it away. What is this rule capable of?--[[User:Vraeyda|Vraeyda]] 15:07, 3 January 2008 (PST) | Woa, woa, woa. Is this rule implying that people can forcibly remove control of a territory from another player? Or is this Conquest rule set just to be applied to territory that as of yet has not been taken? It doesn't seem fair that a player takes the time and patience to build something for a group of IC maurading invaders to just steal it away. What is this rule capable of?--[[User:Vraeyda|Vraeyda]] 15:07, 3 January 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes, it is possible. However, when I expand the rules fully, it'll be seen that player-owned territories (versus staff-owned territories such as Cardinal) will involve the player in the defense of them, giving them a significant opportunity to defend against invaders -- tying in with, in the case of D'hennexian territories, the boosted/static characters granted to them. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[User_talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 17:04, 3 January 2008 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 18:04, 3 January 2008
Woa, woa, woa. Is this rule implying that people can forcibly remove control of a territory from another player? Or is this Conquest rule set just to be applied to territory that as of yet has not been taken? It doesn't seem fair that a player takes the time and patience to build something for a group of IC maurading invaders to just steal it away. What is this rule capable of?--Vraeyda 15:07, 3 January 2008 (PST)
- Yes, it is possible. However, when I expand the rules fully, it'll be seen that player-owned territories (versus staff-owned territories such as Cardinal) will involve the player in the defense of them, giving them a significant opportunity to defend against invaders -- tying in with, in the case of D'hennexian territories, the boosted/static characters granted to them. Hroefn T 17:04, 3 January 2008 (PST)
