Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Enhanced Gain"

Revision as of 08:09, 5 March 2008

Given the implications of the description of this tech, do the additional gains not count toward cap? I assume that cap is left unaltered, but the PL gained through Enhanced Gain just does not count toward it. Tiryst 20:37, 15 December 2006 (CST)

I always figured the 'and per day' part meant cap was altered as well. Wouldn't the end effect be the same, just a more complicated and roundabout way of stating it? Talisantia 21:45, 15 December 2006 (CST)

The issue there is that other things are sometimes based upon either base gain or gain cap, so actually changing the cap can lead to alterations in certain (albeit rare) instances. The end result would essentially be the same between having no cap change and Enhanced Gain being outside of cap, and having cap change and Enhanced Gain included for cap, yes. Just more of a clarification thing on my part. Tiryst 00:09, 16 December 2006 (CST)

Oh, right, I get it. Things like the double cap for DV fights or automatic 'double cap plus X' for plot events. Now I see what you mean. Still, it seems like it would be less complex from a calculation standpoint to state those as exceptions, rather than word the whole rule around a couple of rare circumstances. Talisantia 05:07, 16 December 2006 (CST)

It's not counted toward cap. --Ice 12:09, 16 December 2006 (CST)

I'm considering making this technique also available as a PsiPL technique, as well as KiPL (but still not MagPL). Thoughts, opinions, comments? Hroefn ^T 15:14, 4 March 2008 (PST)

In favor. --Snackycakes 15:17, 4 March 2008 (PST)

Sounds fine to me. -- Cazynus 4 March 2008

As long as magic never has enhanced gain, I don't have a problem with this. Marcus

Okay. Tiryst 23:53, 4 March 2008 (PST)

Sounds good. --Ff0ecaf 07:00, 5 March 2008 (PST)

I'd be alright with it. Pamela 07:09, 5 March 2008 (PST)