Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Magic Power/Committee to Replace Doubled Learning"
From AltWiki
(New page: This page assumes that mage doubling has been removed entirely. The discussion here, therefore, will focus on ways to balance Magic assuming that mage doubling does not exist. So, uh, su...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
So, uh, suggest some crap, guys. [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 12:34, 11 February 2008 (PST) | So, uh, suggest some crap, guys. [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 12:34, 11 February 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Hmmm. Maybe instead of doubled learning, techs get a 'bump' on the bias scale? So good would be excellent, neutral would be good, ect? It's kind of a midway thing between doubled learning and just regular learning. --[[User:Ff0ecaf|Ff0ecaf]] 12:50, 11 February 2008 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 13:50, 11 February 2008
This page assumes that mage doubling has been removed entirely. The discussion here, therefore, will focus on ways to balance Magic assuming that mage doubling does not exist.
So, uh, suggest some crap, guys. Tiryst 12:34, 11 February 2008 (PST)
Hmmm. Maybe instead of doubled learning, techs get a 'bump' on the bias scale? So good would be excellent, neutral would be good, ect? It's kind of a midway thing between doubled learning and just regular learning. --Ff0ecaf 12:50, 11 February 2008 (PST)
